Article The Types of Software Development Models
By Insight Editor / 15 Jul 2016 / Topics: Cloud Modern infrastructure
By Insight Editor / 15 Jul 2016 / Topics: Cloud Modern infrastructure
No matter the type of software or app you’re creating, a development and testing plan is an imperative aspect to the successful completion of any project.
We’ll review the most popular development and software lifecycle management models below, along with their respective advantages and disadvantages.
The Waterfall Model is a linear sequential flow, often used with projects that have a defined set of requirements. Reflective of its name, the model’s process flows steadily downwards through the phases of software implementation.
This model relies on the completion of the previous phase for the following to begin. Because the model does not support going back to previously completed phases, the Waterfall Model should be used with projects that do not anticipate unforeseen changes mid-development.
This approach was one of the earliest models used for software development.
Advantages: Simple and understandable, the Waterfall Model is a manageable method ideal for lifecycle management of smaller projects where the requirements are established and finalized upfront.
Disadvantages: Because of its rigid structure, the Waterfall Model does not work well for complex projects where there is a chance of a change in requirements and/or significant impromptu testing throughout the software development stage.
An extension of the Waterfall Model, the V-Model also functions as a sequential flow. However, instead of only moving linearly downward, the software development lifecycle bends upwards after the coding (for each of the testing phases).
For every phase in the downward sequence, there is a corresponding testing phase in the following upwards sequence. This model is used for projects where software requirements and tools are known upfront.
Advantages: The V-Model is a simple process that’s great for smaller projects. Using the V-Model can yield a higher chance of success due to the test plans of the development stage and regularly schedule updates throughout its lifecycle.
Disadvantages: Similar to the Waterfall Model, the V-Model is very rigid in nature so it isn’t ideal for applications or systems software that may require unforeseen changes/updates throughout the software lifecycle.
Credit: Testing Excellence
Built to mediate the shortcomings of the Waterfall Model, the Incremental Model consists of iterative and incremental development stages. The Incremental Model is essentially comprised of several mini Waterfall cycles.
This model divides the development into small sections/stages and it can allow the software developers to take advantage of learnings and insights gleaned from earlier development stages.
Advantages: The Incremental Model is a great solution for projects that need accommodation for some change requests between increments. This model also yields the benefit of being able to detect problems earlier in the software development for better lifecycle management planning.
Disadvantages: A potential disadvantage to the Incremental Model is the need for strategic planning and documentation. This method also tends to require more resources, staff and monetary, behind the project. This model isn’t ideal for ongoing development as the next sequence cannot begin until the previous stage has fully completed.
Short for Rapid Application Development, the RAD Model is a modification of the Incremental Model. When implementing this model, several components are developed simultaneously as if they were smaller, individual projects. The different components are then assembled into working prototypes.
Advantages: The RAD Model allows for reduced development time and allows for more customer feedback throughout the software development.
Disadvantages: The applicability of the RAD Model is limited, as the project needs to be easily modularized into several increments. It also requires highly-versed developers as well as excellent modeling and planning skills. Issues with the final assembly of components could result in unforeseen setbacks and the redeveloping of components to properly fit the rest.
This model is rooted in process adaptability and user engagement with rapid delivery of functioning software components. It has both Iterative and Incremental features, as it breaks the product development into small incremental builds that are then provided in iterations.
The Agile Model relies on heavy collaboration between cross-functional teams and the customer/user.
Advantages: The Agile Model decreases the amount of time to yield individual system features. It also calls for a lot of communication and continuous feedback from the customer/user that can provide clear direction for the project.
Disadvantages: The Agile method can potentially veer-off track as it relies on end-user interaction that may or may not be clearly expressed. Documentation is also minimal for an Agile software development strategy and requires a well-versed, cross-functional team.
The Iterative Model relies on specifying and implementing individual parts of the software, rather than attempting to start with full specification requirements. Once a rough product is created within an iteration, it is then reviewed and improved in the next iteration and so on. The Iterative Model relies on the whole product being developed step-by-step (Design/Develop, Test, Implement).
Advantages: Since the product is developed gradually, it’s easy to identify problems early when using this software development model.
Disadvantages: Because each iteration phase is rigid with no overlaps, the Iterative Model can take longer and be more costly.
The Spiral Model combines elements of both the Iterative and Waterfall development models, in efforts to combine advantages of top-down and bottom-up production. The Spiral Model has four phases – Identification, Design, Construct/Build, Evaluation and Risk Analysis. The software project repeatedly passes through these phases in iterations called spirals.
Advantages: The Spiral Model can be advantageous as it manages risks and divides development into phases. It also helps with more accurate estimates for budget and schedule as roadblocks are discovered earlier.
Disadvantages: Since this model is highly customized, repurposing the process can be confusing. It also requires team members that are well-versed in risk evaluation.
The Prototype Model relies on creating prototypes of the software applications or system software that are used to visualize various components of the software. This model is used to limit the gap of misunderstanding of requirements by providing ample collaboration and feedback with the user.
Advantages: The Prototype Model can yield reduced time and costs, with heavy user involvement.
Disadvantages: This model can cause user confusion between prototype and finished product and can potentially add excessive development time for prototype development.