By  Scott Yaworski / 26 Aug 2026 / Topics: Artificial Intelligence (AI) , Analytics , Intelligent edge , Data protection

We called our recent webinar “OT Data Rescue” because that's exactly what the work is: recovering stranded operational technology data and turning it into decisions, efficiency, and AI use cases. Watch the full session on demand.
Most operations run partially blind, and it isn't for lack of data. The fixed plant runs on a historian — AVEVA PI, Rockwell, or something similar. The mobile fleet reports somewhere else entirely. Drills, conveyors, and processing units each sit behind their own vendor's controllers. Every system holds a piece of the truth. None of them share it.
So the haul truck engine starts trending toward failure, and the warning signs sit in the onboard telematics while the maintenance team works from a spreadsheet. The truck dies mid-shift. A planned repair becomes lost production.
That's the pattern, and it compounds. Margin walks out the door because you can't see where you're losing it. Risk builds because you're reacting instead of anticipating. And the competitors who've already unified their operational data move while you're still assembling the picture.
Unify the data and the same foundation pays off differently depending on where you sit: predictive maintenance and autonomous operations in mining; digital twins, computer vision quality control, and dynamic line balancing in manufacturing; throughput optimization and consolidated remote operations centers in oil, gas, and energy.
None of this is a science project. It's running in production today. And notice what all of it has in common: clean, accessible, real-time OT data. The AI part is the straightforward part. The data foundation is what's missing. The leaders didn't start with AI, they started by getting their data out of the silos.
In mining, six opportunities are drawing attention right now. Every one of them needs that foundation:
Pick one or two opportunities where the payback is clearest. That's your beachhead. You don't need a full digital transformation to start.
New EU water reporting rules mean a miner that can't report may lose their permit to work. Install the sensors, pipe the data out of the historian, and you've satisfied the requirement. Then use that same data in a digital twin to optimize the heap leach process. In one opportunity we're exploring with a gold miner, that points to higher output, lower water use, better safety, and a payback measured in months. See how Insight approaches business analytics and data modernization.
We've worked with mining, manufacturing, oil and gas, and utility clients long enough to know what was missing: something secure, scalable, and multicloud. That's OT Data Rescue — capture at the field site, pipelines into an analytical platform in a hyperscaler cloud, integration with the systems you already run, and an MLOps foundation so AI value gets built repeatably instead of one project at a time.
We use Cogent DataHub for field-side acquisition, though we've also delivered this with Ignition from Inductive Automation, with AVEVA directly, and with custom software written at the edge.
So why Cogent DataHub? It's multi-source and multi-cloud, so it fits wherever your data starts and wherever you want it to land. It stages that data through ISA-95 or Purdue boundaries — out of the OT network, through the DMZ, into IT, then the cloud — with store-and-forward, queuing, and batching so nothing drops on the way. It integrates natively with the major clouds and other downstream consumers. And it's sold under a perpetual license: You own it, rather than renting it forever.
In Fabric, DataHub connects natively to Eventstream and Event Hub, and data lands in Eventhouse, the real-time time series database. Query it live, put it on real-time dashboards within seconds of the source event, and let thresholds fire alerts by SMS, email, or Teams out of the box. The same data then flows into a lakehouse and combines with master data from your ERP for aggregated reporting — one favorite in flight is a shift report that leaderboards throughput and quality shift over shift.
On AWS, the same output pushes into Kinesis Data Streams, through Firehose into S3, then Redshift and Athena for modeling — feeding AI outputs or visualizations in Amazon Quick Suite. And because the capture layer streams through Kafka or structured streaming, we've built the same pattern into Databricks. One cloud or both, the pattern holds.
A portfolio of hundreds or thousands of tags means nothing to us out of the box. We need the operators and site supervisors who own those devices to tell us what the tags represent and which ones matter. Then, once we've captured the data, we show it back and let them tell us how well we're reading it.
That loop is what makes the numbers trustworthy enough to send up to corporate. Site superintendents know the numbers and they know the math. These projects succeed as a joint effort or they don't succeed.
It starts with an executive briefing and an operational co-design session. We bring starting-point dashboards to your business and operating teams, and ask whether this is what you're after. The answer is almost always no — which is the point, because it tells us what you actually want.
From there, supported by AWS or Microsoft partner funding, first workloads run in a few weeks. Then we expand: more datasets and tags, operational data combined with master data, the reports and data products that drive value. Then we scale that beachhead into production.
Historians store data well. They aren't reporting platforms, they won't scale to an enterprise, and it's hard to combine what's inside them with fleet systems, ERP platforms, or mine planning tools. We're not replacing your historian. We're unlocking what's already in it and combining it with everything else in a common data model.
Directly? Probably not, and you shouldn't want to. That's why the design uses multi-stage exfiltration, with protections at every boundary between OT, the DMZ, and the IT and cloud layer. There should be no direct path between your operating environment and the far broader attack surface the cloud represents, and messaging should only ever run in the intended direction.
Fair question. It depends almost entirely on engagement from the operations team. Where they benefit directly — say we're taking manual daily reporting off their plate — they're invested, and they'll fact-check numbers that are heading up the chain. Four to six weeks is realistic there. Where we're waiting on responses, it takes longer.
Every site differs, too: a different historian, different fleet and plant systems, no common data model, different tags. A good naming convention helps enormously, but it has to be learned site by site.
Proof beats projection. Build something small, quickly realizable and demonstrably valuable, with a roadmap that lets you build forward from it, and the next phase gets much easier to fund.